Pages

Monday, August 03, 2009

Sun-Times sags in Chi-town showdown

Like a pair of proud but over-the-hill prizefighters, the Sun-Times and Tribune are slugging it out in a deadly duel to determine who will remain standing as the sole daily in Chicago.

Both newspapers are operating under Chapter 11 protection and both have seen far better days in terms of circulation and advertising sales. But it’s hardly a fair fight. With an overwhelming advantage in weight, reach and stamina, the Tribune almost certainly is going to win.

Sooner rather than later, the recession, the secular decline in newspaper advertising and a legacy of dysfunctional management will kill the feisty Sun-Times, leaving the Trib alone to serve a metropolitan area of nearly 9.8 million souls.

It’s sad but true: Even in a town as big, bold and vigorous as the Windy City, there evidently is no longer enough business to support more than one metro daily.

The Tribune already dominates the market, selling 501,202 daily papers to 312,141 for the Sun-Times, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations, an industry-funded group. On Sunday, the day of the week that traditionally produces half of a newspaper’s advertising revenues, Trib circulation thumps the Sun-Times by a threefold margin of 858,256 to 254,379.

On the web, the Tribune outdraws the Sun-Times by nearly 2 to 1. The Tribune attracted 4.8 million unique visitors in June vs. 2.8 million for the Sun-Times, according to Editor and Publisher.

As the largest paper in the market, the Tribune not only sells more advertising than the Sun-Times but probably is gaining market share at the expense of its money-losing competitor.

The publishers don’t release detailed ad sales statistics for their individual properties, but it is well known that economic downturns historically have been hard on No. 2 newspapers in the few cities still fortunate enough to have competing dailies. That’s because advertisers tend to channel a greater percentage of their dollars into the dominant paper when recessions force them to cut over-all spending.

To make things worse, the most severe recession since World War II hit at a time when budget-conscious advertisers already had begun diverting dollars away from newspapers to the cheaper and more targetable interactive media. Advertisers in Chicago, as in the rest of the country, have cut back on newspaper expenditures in every major category: retailing, employment, auto and real estate.

Although the Sun-Times is in no position to wait for the economy to improve, the Tribune is.

The Sun-Times Media Group, the parent of the newspaper and some five dozen other weeklies and dailies in the Chicago area, was down to a mere $23 million in cash at the end of June, according to bankruptcy filings provided by reporter Ann Saphir of Crain’s Chicago Business.

Despite continued aggressive cost cutting, the Sun-Times Group lost $2.3 million in June. Assuming no change in the burn rate, the company, which is desperately seeking a wealthy patron to buy it in what would be a prodigious act of civic charity, would be broke within 10 months.

Meantime, the Tribune Co., which owns the eponymous newspaper, delivered a 15% profit in June. The company sought bankruptcy protection in December just days before the one-year anniversary of the $13 billion transaction that recklessly overburdened it with debt.

The Tribune Co., which owns an array of broadcast and publishing assets across the nation, generated a net profit in June of $43.9 million on revenue of $289.7 million, according to Trib columnist Phil Rosenthal. The company ended the month with $740.5 million in cash, or nearly 32 times more of a cushion than the struggling Sun-Times.

The Tribune shrewdly is pressing its advantage, too, as the dominant, multi-media force in town. In addition to publishing the flagship newspaper, Tribune Co. blankets Chicago with:

:: A jazzy, free, youth-oriented tabloid called the Red Eye that has been chewing into news-stand sales for the Sun-Times since 2002. Some 200,000 free copies of the Red Eye flood the market every business day, with 130,000 copies distributed on Saturday.

:: A tabloid edition of the broadsheet Chicago Tribune sold side-by-side with the Sun-Times at vending machines and transit stops. Home-delivery subscribers still get a broadsheet.

:: Hoy, free a daily Spanish-language tabloid newspaper and an affiliated website, ViveloHoy.Com.

:: Some 65 hyper-local Triblocal weekly print supplements and websites to combat a similar number of daily and local community properties and websites published by the Sun-Times.

:: Powerful broadcast properties including WGN television, a CW affiliate; WGN-AM, a major talk-radio outlet, and CLTV, a 24-hour cable channel featuring local news.

:: Chicago, a slick monthly city magazine.

:: The Metromix entertainment website and a new compendium of 60-plus local blogs called ChicagoNow.

A great example of how all this media power was brought to bear occurred in the spring, when Target wanted to promote the designer brands featured in its bargain-priced stores by opening a Bullseye Bazaar in downtown Chicago.

A Bullseye Bazaar, which is known in the trade as a pop-up store, is opened for only a few days in a prominent location to capture the attention of consumers and press. Then, it is shut down.

As luck would have it, the Chicago Tribune happened to have prime, ground-floor retail space available at its headquarters building on tony Michigan Avenue. The space at the Tribune Tower recently had been vacated by the McCormick Freedom Museum, a collection of exhibits promoting the First Amendment.

Randy Michaels, the chief operating office of Tribune Co. explained how the Tribune capitalized on the opportunity in a memo to the staff:

“Target bought a four-page wrap-around section in RedEye, additional ads in Chicago Tribune and on its website, chicagotribune.com. The stars of The CW’s ‘Gossip Girl’ attended the press preview of the store.”

The ad purchases were accompanied by some nice ink in the Tribune and favorable play at CLTV.Com. The Sun-Times helpfully pitched in with some buzz, too.

“Target, a major client, is extremely happy,” Michaels said in his memo. As further proof, take a look at the graphic below, where a Target ad is stripped across the bottom of the front page of yesterday’s Tribune.

“In a tough ad environment” the close collaboration of a media company and its advertisers “means a lot,” Michaels told the staff.

In fight to the finish wth your cross-town rival, it may mean even more.

10 comments:

  1. Some of the STMG papers are trying to escape

    http://www.buytheposttribune.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Newspapers should study the Illegal Drug Trade...

    When a street dealer gets pushed out of their market by a competitor (Internet, Social Media) they take one of the following actions:

    1. Kill all the competition
    2. Create a better product and steal their customers back

    Newspapers don't have a shot in hell of killing their competition. Even small businesses and savvy individuals leverage the Internet for market share, so that won't work.

    That leaves them with a less appealing job -- creating a better product.

    Help me, Help YOU

    I went to a Social Media Breakfast in Burlington, Vermont today headlined by Jason Kintzler of PitchEngine and Sarah Evans (PRSarahEvans on Twitter).

    Both command huge followings Online and turn a lovely profit to boot.

    They started with (almost nothing).

    Newspapers -- Stop branding yourselves as papers and move the needle forward.

    I want to believe in you.

    If you have an answer or comment for me, please hit me up on Twitter:
    @JoeMescher

    or

    Social Media Commando

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous5:31 PM

    From Mark Suppelsa's Closer Look 12/05: Marshall Field sees a similar crisis at the local newspaper his family once owned, where he was once publisher, the Chicago Sun-Times.

    FIELD: That business, you can argue, thanks to computers, et cetera, doesn't have a glorious future. The biggest strength I see, frankly, in a newspaper today is its newsgathering ability. Or if it really worked on columnists, its writers' ability. And they should really be more of a software supplier than a hard newspaper. They should spend less time worrying about putting out their paper and more time worrying about what's in it.

    Gosh Alan...Where is Marshall Field when we need him?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Debra Grace (dg)5:32 PM

    Hey guys- so true. Glad I saw this. You're linked from ChiTownRadio by the way, that's how I found you.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There was a Target ad across the bottom of monday's sun-times, as well, so, by your reasoning, target must be satisfied with its returns onthe Bright One. Just sayin' ...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:11 PM

    The Sun-Times has a very annoying website. It's slow in loading and not easy to navigate. I'd visit the site more except for that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10:07 PM

    Does the Herald figure in this?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous7:22 AM

    I've been reading obits on the Sun-Times for more than 30 years now, but somehow the paper keeps publishing each morning. I think you wrote a similar piece to this in January, but the paper isn't quite dead yet.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous7:27 AM

    It seems unfair to compare Sunday circulation numbers for the two papers. The Sun-Times' Sunday circulation has always been weak; it is a commuter paper afterall. Why not compare weekday circulation numbers?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous8:46 PM

    It's a pretty chart, but it's what Edward Tufte, in The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, calls "chart junk," because it distorts the facts.

    The Tribune's circulation is 3.4 times the Sun-Times' circulation, so the vertical proportion of the images is okay. But you've made the image of the Times twice as wide as the image of the Sun-Times. When people look at images such as these, they don't take into account only the vertical dimension--they see instead the respective areas.

    You have given the Times twice the area that it should have, in proportion to the Sun-Times, and thus your pretty picture gives viewers a false impression.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.